Little light goes a long way

By Heather Sylvawood, Amazon Author

Have you seen those pictures taken from space looking back at the Earth? They look beautiful, like the Earth is a jewelled crown. We seem intent on lighting up space with our collective lighting energy.

Are we sending out a message to space? “Here we are. This is a perfect example of how we squander our resources.”

Earth from space

But so much of that energy is wasted on streets with few people in them or lighted while most residents sleep. What we need is targeted light as shown in the video below:

Have you seen this video?

We have the  lighting technology, so why aren’t we using it and spending the saved energy on more important things?

By Heather Sylvawood, Amazon Author

Advertisements

Solar water heating gets the thumbs up

On my Energy Issues page I mentioned some research that we did to find out about going off-the-grid for all our power. The challenges became so daunting (and expensive) we gave it away, however, now we are about to go solar for our water heating.

It really does pay to talk to experts because they do have some practical passive energy solutions that the average homeowner (I include myself in that group) wouldn’t think about. We had always gazed skyward and had seen our steeply sloping roof as ideal for panels. Panel dimensions, however, turned out to be too large for the space where we planned. They would have to go across part of the upper windows (see photo) to get the optimum slope.

KowhaiCottageSale 014

The installer we talked to suggested that the panel(s) be positioned in front of our deck (the deck on the right not in the picture) . The panel would be unseen when we were on our deck or from inside; the installation would not compromise the integrity of our roof; and being a retro-install we would not have to cut into walls to link up to the current position of the water heater.

We will have to move a few plants – a couple that will now be behind the panel, and one that will cast a shadow over the panel. Having a house built at the top of a slope has helped because we will not be built out or have trees in lower properties grow too tall.

So now we’re preparing the site. We won’t be able to do a straight comparison of costs as we generally turn off the water heater unless we have guests. Instead we use a system of gas water heating. The installer’s proposal is that we will have a dual system. When solar energy is low and the water temperature drops we will be able to switch back to gas heating, and vice versa.

I think it’s natural to think that solar panels have to be placed on the roof. It always seems to be the place nearest the sun. We have since researched a number of ways they can be positioned if the house roof is not ideal. They can be placed behind the house, raised above sheds, or placed on fences. In fact YouTube has a great selection of systems to copy.

If you’re really interested in doing some of the process yourself take a look at these YouTube videos –

By Heather Sylvawood, author of Real Estate Rollercoaster – what the professionals forget to tell you about buying, building and selling real estate.

The true cost of energy

I recently stumbled across an article from Inhabitat about a German village that produces so much electrical energy that it makes about 5.6million euros profit for the villagers each year. I was so inspired that I have been thinking how my locality (population 4,500) could replicate that energy success.

Already many individual households are installing solar water heating and solar power panels for running their other electrical systems. (Take a look at the Little Greenie website) In a few months we have plans to go that route too – can’t wait. Even though the installation cost will take several years to pay off if you simply compare cost dollars to savings on power charges, the thing that excites me is we will be reducing the demand on coal and gas generation*.

One household installing solar panels doesn’t have much of an effect, however when you reach hundreds or thousands of houses with alternative power systems the impact becomes enormous. If there would be one inspiring dream I would have, it would be to turn out lovely Golden Bay into an energy-neutral location.

Of course, as quickly as these passive energy options are installed the faster we increase our power consumption by installing and using new technologies – automatic appliances and computer technology – that we forget to turn off at night. Appliances left on stand-by use up an unbelievable amount of power over a year. Take a look at Standby Power or EECA Energywise websites. But that’s for some more research!

*Note: In New Zealand we do not have nuclear power generation. By far the largest amount of electricity is generated by hydro-generation plants. But even these have an impact on the local environment through flooding of valleys to create dams and the interruption of natural habitats for native fish and plants.

By Heather Sylvawood, author of Real Estate Rollercoaster.

A Solar Power Dilemma

We recently looked into installing a solar power system and found the option to be riddled with limitations. That’s not to say we are turned off (LOL) but we are certainly having to make some compromises. Here are a few things we have found out that make installing photo voltaic panels a challenge.

Solar panels are an inefficient way of heating water. Photo voltaic panels vary in their output but in conversion of energy for heating water they are less efficient than a water-circulating solar water heater. In the photo voltaic panels solar energy is converted into direct current that is then converted into alternating current that we can use in our normal appliances and lighting. A solar water heater has water in pipes that are directly heated by the sun or reflection. The hot water is pumped or rises to the water tank and is replaced by cold water. The water circulates becoming hotter and hotter the longer sunshine is hitting the pipes somewhere on the heater. Unlike solar voltaic panels a solar water heater can work even if the sun is hitting the water pipes at a low angle. Solar voltaic panels need direct sun or at no less than 30 degree angle.

Location and position are everything. Living on a hill in Golden Bay, which has high sunshine hours and no pollution, we should be ideal for solar panels. Not only do we have no large trees shading the roof, we also have the bonus of a large body of reflective water to up the ante. Unfortunately in the middle of winter our sun is obscured by a slight hill until about 10am. This is when we would really want some input. However, not all is lost, because at the height of the day one roof would be receiving full on sunshine and the other, at a slight westerly angle, would receive sunshine at lesser levels. So position-wise we would be fine. Except that the size of the panels is such that we cannot fit enough of them to cover what we are currently using in electricity.

On-the-grid options. If we go ahead with solar we can supplement our power from the power supplier. This means that during times when sunshine is not enough to meet our requirements we can use and be charged by the power supply for the power we use. Conversely, when our solar panels and producing more than we need we can give back to the grid (and store up credits for power we later use). Sounds ideal! But it doesn’t guarantee us continuous power. If the power supply goes down, and it is known to do so in our rural retreat, we lose power even if our solar panels are producing it at the time. The reason is that power company workers will assume they are working with dead lines, and if we’re busily feeding back into the grid – zappo chappo. So the minute the grid goes down our solar energy generation stops too.

Off-the-grid options. Ah ha! So what if we went off the grid completely? First, the installation costs are more expensive and we would have to install a large bank of batteries to store enough energy to maintain our household systems when the direct solar input is not enough – at night and on wintery days, of course. From an ecological point of view batteries are not okay. They last about 10 years before they need to be replaced. Then they and their destructive fluids have to be disposed of safely.

So now we are looking at:

  • Ways to reduce our current energy use so that panels would cover our power consumption
  • Ways to combine a solar water heater with voltaic panels for other power
  • Whether to change our stove to an all gas model (LPG has its own green issues)
  • Whether to add a wetback option to our wonderful Metro fire that has considerably reduced our winter power use (we use it for slow cooking and boiling the kettle)

Just watch this space as we explore the options further

A good site to check out is the NZ Government’s energy website: http://www.eecabusiness.govt.nz/renewable-energy/solar